After the Community Input session at Amity Church and the Town sponsored survey, many felt that community members had spoken clearly that the four maps brought to the meeting brought too much intensity and traffic to the area. The session was attended by over 230 people, despite a Back to School event the same evening. Although the Committee had voted against allowing the Citizen Map to be presented at the workshop, copies were distributed outside the door. Lively conversation made up for fairly primitive displays of red and green dots. Although the Citizen Plan had not been invited to the party, it was the most popular guest.
In the Report to the Citizens of Chapel Hill four members of the Steering Committee explain why they favored the Alternate Citizens’ Plan over the Committee Plan.
The following week, the Co chairs decided on their own to go back to the drawing board on the concept map. Amy Ryan and Michael Parker initiated private meetings with every committee member where they sought views of what should be on a map. From these meetings grew a new hand colored map – a separate but collective view. At the September 24 Steering Committee meeting, members were invited to make individual suggestions for the new map .Over 55 recommendations were articulated and listed as possible changes. The co chairs followed up with motions and the committee voted on some of them. Many suggestions were left on the table, not discussed, and never revisited.
Some steering committee members expressed disappointment that the new map lacked the good traffic analysis done previously on A1 – B2 maps (the ones that had been taken to the workshop). They said the Council deserved a map that would show where density should go in order to estimate the impact on traffic. They also pressed for setbacks, lower heights and density in order to reduce new expected traffic on Estes from Carolina North and other new development. Alan Tom closed this meeting with an articulate summary of the year’s progress in Central West. See Alan’s remarks.