August 19 Staff action meeting notes are here. The Committee now has 4 maps on the table found here. Several committee members told staff that they did not have sufficient content to be analyzed. The don’t show building foot prints, intensity or road circulations, unlike earlier maps. Staff shared an outline for the small area plan. Steering Committee David Tuttle explained he found the steering committee meetings lacking in dialogue and a real exchange of views. He was saddened that committee members no longer seemed to care about taking a consensus recommendation to the Council – on that the community and a committee minority would support.
August 7 Staff action notes are here. This meeting was frustrating to observe. Because the Committee lacks a skilled facilitator, committee members engage in serial conversations and conversation is not around one topic. Decisions as recorded by co chair report are here.
- Parcels B and C should have a mix of uses including: incubator (create relationship with Carolina North), significant residential along northern section, non-residential uses along Estes (intensities that are lower than Parcel A) and institutional uses such as a parks and recreation center. An alternative scenario for this area should also be tested that would call for residential uses only on these parcels.
- Consider a road connecting Somerset and the proposed road running along the south part of the YMCA property to MLK and have it tested for transportation impacts.
- For area E, to apply environmental language from earlier discussions of areas G and H, and test two options: one that is residential, and one that is primarily residential with institutional/office uses along Estes Drive frontage.
- Area J should be residential.
- Because of meeting time constraints, the group was not able to make specific building height recommendations for areas A–F. It was agreed that we would test on the range of heights suggested by a majority of committee members in the July 1st “homework” activity, with area C changed from 2-4 stories, with any decision that the Committee has already made to supersede the July 1st activity heights.
- The group decided to test continuation of the area A retail strip south of MLK onto D and F. For testing purposes, we would assume that D would be a synthesis of uses and heights for areas A and B, and that F would assume an expansion of its current institutional use. A low-end use for Parcel D — institutional with a small area of retail — would also be tested..
July 30 Most of this meeting was a discussion about preferred land uses, intensities and heights for the undeveloped land south of Estes Drive. Results are shown here. Several members of the steering committee asked for a big picture discussion about data about land constraints and traffic for the area BEFORE making these decisions on a tract by tract basis. They did not convince the co chairs of this approach. Whit Rummel presented his concept for retail, housing and civic uses for the undeveloped property north of Estes.